Curriculum

Essays

Workshops

Standards

Educ Home

 

Pacific Worlds > Education > Teacher Workshops > Guam 2002 #2

 

August 2002 Guam Workshop:
Audience Reaction Survey

Workshop #2: High School Teachers
Held at Guam Learning Resource Center
Total respondents = 11

Workshop Sponsor:
Pacific Resources for Education & Learning


 

In your opinion, which of the following humanities areas were involved in this program?

Philosophy

6

History

11

Literary Studies

11

Languages

11

Ethics

7

Comparative Religion

7

Cultural Anthropology

10

Archaeology

6

Linguistics

10

Social Sciences

10

Jurisprudence

1

History, theory & criticism of Arts

8

What approaches to the humanities content did the program presenters use?

7

Provided info from the perspectives of humanities fields of study

5

Raised questions about ethical values or human rights etc.

10

Compared or contrasted alternative ways of thinking

9

Encouraged critical thinking and questioning

9

Interpreted, analyzed or clarified the issues involved

8

Explained historical patterns for background

10

Discussed cultural differences

10

Encouraged audience discussion and participation

Please check all the words and phrases you think apply to the program:

10

Stimulating

0

Superficial

8

Well Paced

11

Informative

0

Too scholarly

0

Boring

1

Biased

9

Well Balanced

9

Enriching

10

Clearly Focused

0

Confusing

0

Wordy

Overall, how would you rate this program?

Poor

0

Fair

0

Good

0

Excellent

11

 

Participant reaction surveys to workshops:

February 2001
O‘ahu

June 2001 - East West Center (data not available)

November 2001
Kaua‘i

March 2002
NHEA Conference:

1st Session
2nd Session

August 2002
Guam:
#1: Elementary
#2: Middle & High

March 2004
NHEA Conference:

1st Session
2nd Session

March 2004
"Focus Micronesia"

PATE 2004
Samoa

 

 


1. Other Comments

  • It has been worth, enriching and informative.
  • Excellent

 

 


2. How did you learn about this program (newspaper, organizational newsletter, radio, TV, from a friend, flyer, poster, etc.)?

  • Chosen by my school, didn’t mind
  • From my administrator
  • School
  • Fellow worker
  • DOE
  • Organizational newsletter
  • School
  • Work, department memo
  • Invitation from DOE
  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Chosen to represent our school

 

 


3. For you, what were the most worthwhile parts or aspects of the program?

  • All of it, very mind opening
  • Recurring information about sites available on the web that can help students better understand their cultural history as well as those around them
  • Sitemaps
  • All of it, presentation and discussion
  • Sharing of information and the use of the internet
  • Working out the computer
  • Local people’s perspective
  • I was able to participate in the editing of the information with its creator
  • Information, data; indigenous perspective of indigenous concerns
  • The sharing of information and discussions
  • The information that was given. The resourcefulness to myself as an individual and as an educator

 

 


4. What were the least worthwhile parts?

  • Nothing wrong, all good
  • Certain parts were short, not explained in full
  • Nothing

 

 


5. Please feel free to comment below on any aspect of the program. Thank you for your assistance.

  • Excellent program. Please come back and share more
  • Excellent for Dr. Herman.  Kudos!
  • Thank you
  • I look forward to the next workshop.
  • Great program, keep it up
  • Very much needed for present and future education
  • Great Job

 

 


 

Curriculum |  Teacher Workshops  |  Standards-Based  |  Education Home

Home |  About this Site |  Education |  Our Sponsors |  Contact Us |  Site Map & Index

 

 

Copyright 2003, Pacific Worlds & Associates